Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 10% cited

Comprehensive statistical study of 452 BRCA1 missense substitutions with classification of eight recurrent substitutions as neutral

Journal of Medical Genetics · 2005 · Vol. 43(4) · pp. 295–305
Sean V. TavtigianA M DeffenbaughL YinT JudkinsT SchollP B SamollowD de SilvaA ZharkikhA Thomas

Abstract

The methods combined here can classify as neutral about 50% of missense substitutions that have been observed with two or more clearly deleterious mutations. Furthermore, odds ratios estimated for sets of substitutions grouped by A-GVGD scores are consistent with the hypothesis that most unclassified substitutions that are within the cross-species range of variation at their position in BRCA1 are also neutral. For most of these, clinical reclassification will require integrated application of other methods such as pooled family histories, segregation analysis, or validated functional assay.

MeSH terms

Amino Acid SequenceBreast NeoplasmsData Interpretation, StatisticalDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHaplotypesHumansOvarian NeoplasmsSequence AlignmentEvolution, MolecularBRCA1 ProteinGenes, BRCA1Amino Acid SubstitutionMutation, MissenseGenes, BRCA2
Citations
660
FWCI
8.88
field-weighted impact
References
32
Percentile
98%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Comprehensive statistical study of 452 BRCA1 missense substitutions with classification of eight recurrent substitutions as neutral · Scinovex