Scinovex
reviewTop 1% cited

Templates and anchors: neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land

Journal of Experimental Biology · 1999 · Vol. 202(23) · pp. 3325–3332
Robert J. FullD. E. Koditschek

Abstract

Locomotion results from complex, high-dimensional, non-linear, dynamically coupled interactions between an organism and its environment. Fortunately, simple models we call templates have been and can be made to resolve the redundancy of multiple legs, joints and muscles by seeking synergies and symmetries. A template is the simplest model (least number of variables and parameters) that exhibits a targeted behavior. For example, diverse species that differ in skeletal type, leg number and posture run in a stable manner like sagittal- and horizontal-plane spring-mass systems. Templates suggest control strategies that can be tested against empirical data. Templates must be grounded in more detailed morphological and physiological models to ask specific questions about multiple legs, the joint torques that actuate them, the recruitment of muscles that produce those torques and the neural networks that activate the ensemble. We term these more elaborate models anchors. They introduce representations of specific biological details whose mechanism of coordination is of interest. Since mechanisms require controls, anchors incorporate specific hypotheses concerning the manner in which unnecessary motion or energy from legs, joints and muscles is removed, leaving behind the behavior of the body in the low-degree-of-freedom template. Locating the origin of control is a challenge because neural and mechanical systems are dynamically coupled and both play a role. The control of slow, variable-frequency locomotion appears to be dominated by the nervous system, whereas during rapid, rhythmic locomotion, the control may reside more within the mechanical system. Anchored templates of many-legged, sprawled-postured animals suggest that passive, dynamic self-stabilization from a feedforward, tuned mechanical system can reject rapid perturbations and simplify control. Future progress would benefit from the creation of a field embracing comparative neuromechanics.

Robotic Locomotion and ControlMuscle activation and electromyography studiesMotor Control and AdaptationTemplateComputer scienceRedundancy (engineering)Mechanism (biology)Physics

MeSH terms

AnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaExtremitiesHumansJointsLocomotionModels, BiologicalRunningWalking
Citations
1,105
FWCI
12.76
field-weighted impact
References
53
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Compliant leg behaviour explains basic dynamics of walking and running
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · 2006 · 942 citations
THE NEURAL ORIGIN OF MUSCLE SYNERGIES
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología · 2013 · 518 citations
References
Mechanical work in terrestrial locomotion: two basic mechanisms for minimizing energy expenditure
American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · 1977 · 1,425 citations
The spring-mass model for running and hopping
Journal of Biomechanics · 1989 · 1,643 citations
The co-ordination and regulation of movements
Brain Research · 1969 · 5,105 citations
Dynamic Programming
Science · 1966 · 13,052 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Templates and anchors: neuromechanical hypotheses of legged locomotion on land · Scinovex