Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement

BMJ · 2013 · Vol. 346(mar25 1) · pp. f1049–f1049
Don HusereauMichael DrummondStavros PetrouChris CarswellDavid MoherDan GreenbergFederico AugustovskiAndrew BriggsJosephine MauskopfElizabeth Loderon behalf of the CHEERS Task Force

Abstract

Economic evaluations of health interventions pose a particular challenge for reporting. There is also a need to consolidate and update existing guidelines and promote their use in a user friendly manner. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement is an attempt to consolidate and update previous health economic evaluation guidelines efforts into one current, useful reporting guidance. The primary audiences for the CHEERS statement are researchers reporting economic evaluations and the editors and peer reviewers assessing them for publication. The need for new reporting guidance was identified by a survey of medical editors. A list of possible items based on a systematic review was created. A two round, modified Delphi panel consisting of representatives from academia, clinical practice, industry, government, and the editorial community was conducted. Out of 44 candidate items, 24 items and accompanying recommendations were developed. The recommendations are contained in a user friendly, 24 item checklist. A copy of the statement, accompanying checklist, and this report can be found on the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluations Publication Guidelines Task Force website (www.ispor.org/TaskForces/EconomicPubGuidelines.asp). We hope CHEERS will lead to better reporting, and ultimately, better health decisions. To facilitate dissemination and uptake, the CHEERS statement is being co-published across 10 health economics and medical journals. We encourage other journals and groups, to endorse CHEERS. The author team plans to review the checklist for an update in five years.

Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealthcare Policy and ManagementHealthcare cost, quality, practicesChecklistGovernment (linguistics)Statement (logic)Delphi methodConsolidated Standards of Reporting TrialsSystematic reviewEconomic evaluationPsychological interventionPublic relationsDelphi

MeSH terms

Costs and Cost AnalysisDelphi TechniqueEconomicsHealth PolicyHumansPublishingQuality ControlReference StandardsGuidelines as TopicComparative Effectiveness ResearchChecklist
Citations
1,752
FWCI
307.69
field-weighted impact
References
32
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.