Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Validity of DSM-IV attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptom dimensions and subtypes.

Journal of Abnormal Psychology · 2012 · Vol. 121(4) · pp. 991–1010
Erik G. WillcuttJoel T. NiggBruce F. PenningtonMary V. SolantoLuís Augusto RohdeRosemary TannockSandra K. LooCaryn L. CarlsonKeith McBurnettBenjamin B. Lahey

Abstract

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) specify two dimensions of inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms that are used to define three nominal subtypes: predominantly hyperactive-impulsive type (ADHD-H), predominantly inattentive type (ADHD-I), and combined type (ADHD-C). To aid decision making for DSM-5 and other future diagnostic systems, a comprehensive literature review and meta-analysis of 546 studies was completed to evaluate the validity of the DSM-IV model of ADHD. Results indicated that DSM-IV criteria identify individuals with significant and persistent impairment in social, academic, occupational, and adaptive functioning when intelligence, demographic factors, and concurrent psychopathology are controlled. Available data overwhelmingly support the concurrent, predictive, and discriminant validity of the distinction between inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms, and indicate that nearly all differences among the nominal subtypes are consistent with the relative levels of inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms that define the subtypes. In contrast, the DSM-IV subtype model is compromised by weak evidence for the validity of ADHD-H after first grade, minimal support for the distinction between ADHD-I and ADHD-C in studies of etiological influences, academic and cognitive functioning, and treatment response, and the marked longitudinal instability of all three subtypes. Overall, we conclude that the DSM-IV ADHD subtypes provide a convenient clinical shorthand to describe the functional and behavioral correlates of current levels of inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms, but do not identify discrete subgroups with sufficient long-term stability to justify the classification of distinct forms of the disorder. Empirical support is stronger for an alternative model that would replace the subtypes with dimensional modifiers that reflect the number of inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity symptoms at the time of assessment. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2012 APA, all rights reserved).

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentImpulsivityPsychologyAttention deficit hyperactivity disorderPredictive validityIncremental validityClinical psychologyPsychopathologyDiscriminant validityDSM-5Cognition

MeSH terms

AttentionAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityCognitionFemaleHumansMaleDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

Funding

  • National Institutes of Health
Citations
875
FWCI
41.12
field-weighted impact
References
72
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Neuroinflammation as a risk factor for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior · 2019 · 285 citations
Practitioner Review: What have we learnt about the causes of ADHD?
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · 2012 · 694 citations
References
Construct validity in psychological tests.
Psychological Bulletin · 1955 · 10,738 citations
The MTA at 8 Years: Prospective Follow-up of Children Treated for Combined-Type ADHD in a Multisite Study
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · 2009 · 1,164 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.