Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal‐to‐noise comparison in head images

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2001 · Vol. 46(1) · pp. 24–30
J. Thomas VaughanMichael GarwoodChristopher M. CollinsW. LiuLance DelaBarreGregor AdrianyPeter E. AndersenHellmut MerkleRainer GoebelMichael B. SmithKâmil Uǧurbil

Abstract

Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), RF field (B(1)), and RF power requirement for human head imaging were examined at 7T and 4T magnetic field strengths. The variation in B(1) magnitude was nearly twofold higher at 7T than at 4T ( approximately 42% compared to approximately 23%). The power required for a 90 degrees pulse in the center of the head at 7T was approximately twice that at 4T. The SNR averaged over the brain was at least 1.6 times higher at 7T compared to 4T. These experimental results were consistent with calculations performed using a human head model and Maxwell's equations. Magn Reson Med 46:24-30, 2001.

Advanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsUltrasound Imaging and ElastographyAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchHead (geology)Nuclear magnetic resonanceHuman headPhysicsHomogeneity (statistics)Radio frequencySIGNAL (programming language)RF power amplifierMagnetic fieldOptics

MeSH terms

BrainCalibrationHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadio Waves

Funding

  • W. M. Keck Foundation
  • University of Minnesota
  • National Institutes of Health
Citations
885
FWCI
14.06
field-weighted impact
References
25
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
The intrinsic signal‐to‐noise ratio in NMR imaging
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 1986 · 753 citations
Snapshot flash mri. applications to t1, t2, and chemical‐shift imaging
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 1990 · 694 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal‐to‐noise comparison in head images · Scinovex