articleTop 1% cited
Fuzzy AHP to determine the relative weights of evaluation criteria and Fuzzy TOPSIS to rank the alternatives
Applied Soft Computing · 2009 · Vol. 10(2) · pp. 520–528
Fatemeh Torfi(Mazandaran University of Science and Technology)Reza Zanjirani Farahani✉(National University of Singapore)Shabnam Rezapour(Urmia University of Technology)
Multi-Criteria Decision MakingQuality Function Deployment in Product DesignOptimization and Mathematical ProgrammingMultiple-criteria decision analysisIdeal solutionFuzzy logicRank (graph theory)Mathematical optimizationTOPSISAnalytic hierarchy processComputer sciencePreferenceMathematics
Citations
390
FWCI
20.04
field-weighted impact
References
30
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies
Applied Soft Computing · 2014 · 561 citations
Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications – Two decades review from 1994 to 2014
Expert Systems with Applications · 2015 · 904 citations
References
Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications
Medical Entomology and Zoology · 1981 · 8,269 citations
Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment
Fuzzy Sets and Systems · 2000 · 3,721 citations
The evaluation of airline service quality by fuzzy MCDM
Tourism Management · 2002 · 882 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.