Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Gene Expression Profiling in Breast Cancer: Understanding the Molecular Basis of Histologic Grade To Improve Prognosis

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2006 · Vol. 98(4) · pp. 262–272
Christos SotiriouPratyaksha WirapatiSherene LoiAdrian L. HarrisStephen B. FoxJohanna SmedsHans NordgrenPierre FarmerViviane PrazBenjamin Haibe‐KainsChristine DesmedtDenis LarsimontFátima CardosoHans PeterseDimitry S.A. NuytenMarc BuyseMarc J. van de VijverJonas BerghMartine PiccartMauro Delorenzi

Abstract

Background: Histologic grade in breast cancer provides clinically important prognostic information. However, 30%–60% of tumors are classified as histologic grade 2. This grade is associated with an intermediate risk of recurrence and is thus not informative for clinical decision making. We examined whether histologic grade was associated with gene expression profiles of breast cancers and whether such profiles could be used to improve histologic grading. Methods: We analyzed microarray data from 189 invasive breast carcinomas and from three published gene expression datasets from breast carcinomas. We identified differentially expressed genes in a training set of 64 estrogen receptor (ER)–positive tumor samples by comparing expression profiles between histologic grade 3 tumors and histologic grade 1 tumors and used the expression of these genes to define the gene expression grade index. Data from 597 independent tumors were used to evaluate the association between relapse-free survival and the gene expression grade index in a Kaplan–Meier analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: We identified 97 genes in our training set that were associated with histologic grade; most of these genes were involved in cell cycle regulation and proliferation. In validation datasets, the gene expression grade index was strongly associated with histologic grade 1 and 3 status; however, among histologic grade 2 tumors, the index spanned the values for histologic grade 1–3 tumors. Among patients with histologic grade 2 tumors, a high gene expression grade index was associated with a higher risk of recurrence than a low gene expression grade index (hazard ratio = 3.61, 95% confidence interval = 2.25 to 5.78; P <.001, log-rank test). Conclusions: Gene expression grade index appeared to reclassify patients with histologic grade 2 tumors into two groups with high versus low risks of recurrence. This approach may improve the accuracy of tumor grading and thus its prognostic value.

Breast Cancer Treatment StudiesGene expression and cancer classificationBioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGrading (engineering)Breast cancerGene expression profilingGene expressionMedicinePathologyProliferative indexOncologyProliferation indexNottingham Prognostic Index
Citations
2,125
FWCI
50.98
field-weighted impact
References
32
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
The Nottingham prognostic index in primary breast cancer
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · 1992 · 1,067 citations
Molecular portraits of human breast tumours
Nature · 2000 · 16,173 citations
Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2001 · 10,888 citations
Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · 2003 · 5,398 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.