Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Evaluation of general 16S ribosomal RNA gene PCR primers for classical and next-generation sequencing-based diversity studies

Nucleic Acids Research · 2012 · Vol. 41(1) · pp. e1–e1
Anna KlindworthElmar PruesseTimmy SchweerJörg PepliesChristian QuastMatthias HornFrank Oliver Glöckner

Abstract

16S ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA) amplicon analysis remains the standard approach for the cultivation-independent investigation of microbial diversity. The accuracy of these analyses depends strongly on the choice of primers. The overall coverage and phylum spectrum of 175 primers and 512 primer pairs were evaluated in silico with respect to the SILVA 16S/18S rDNA non-redundant reference dataset (SSURef 108 NR). Based on this evaluation a selection of 'best available' primer pairs for Bacteria and Archaea for three amplicon size classes (100-400, 400-1000, ≥ 1000 bp) is provided. The most promising bacterial primer pair (S-D-Bact-0341-b-S-17/S-D-Bact-0785-a-A-21), with an amplicon size of 464 bp, was experimentally evaluated by comparing the taxonomic distribution of the 16S rDNA amplicons with 16S rDNA fragments from directly sequenced metagenomes. The results of this study may be used as a guideline for selecting primer pairs with the best overall coverage and phylum spectrum for specific applications, therefore reducing the bias in PCR-based microbial diversity studies.

Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMicrobial Community Ecology and PhysiologyGut microbiota and healthBiologyAmplicon16S ribosomal RNAPrimer (cosmetics)GeneticsRibosomal RNAIn silicoRibosomal DNAPolymerase chain reactionGene

MeSH terms

ArchaeaBacteriaComputer SimulationRNA, Ribosomal, 16SGenetic VariationPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNADNA PrimersGenes, rRNABiodiversityMetagenomeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

Funding

  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
  • Argonne National Laboratory
Citations
8,731
FWCI
35.04
field-weighted impact
References
57
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Related articles
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.