Scinovex
articleTop 10% cited

Combining independent studies of a diagnostic test into a summary roc curve: Data‐analytic approaches and some additional considerations

Statistics in Medicine · 1993 · Vol. 12(14) · pp. 1293–1316
Lincoln E. MosesDavid E. ShapiroBenjamin Littenberg

Abstract

We consider how to combine several independent studies of the same diagnostic test, where each study reports an estimated false positive rate (FPR) and an estimated true positive rate (TPR). We propose constructing a summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve by the following steps. (i) Convert each FPR to its logistic transform U and each TPR to its logistic transform V after increasing each observed frequency by adding 1/2. (ii) For each study calculate D = V - U, which is the log odds ratio of TPR and FPR, and S = V + U, an implied function of test threshold; then plot each study's point (Si, Di). (iii) Fit a robust-resistant regression line to these points (or an equally weighted least-squares regression line), with V - U as the dependent variable. (iv) Back-transform the line to ROC space. To avoid model-dependent extrapolation from irrelevant regions of ROC space we propose defining a priori a value of FPR so large that the test simply would not be used at that FPR, and a value of TPR so low that the test would not be used at that TPR. Then (a) only data points lying in the thus defined north-west rectangle of the unit square are used in the data analysis, and (b) the estimated summary ROC is depicted only within that subregion of the unit square. We illustrate the methods using simulated and real data sets, and we point to ways of comparing different tests and of taking into account the effects of covariates.

Advanced Statistical Methods and ModelsStatistical Methods and InferenceProbabilistic and Robust Engineering DesignComputer scienceTest (biology)StatisticsReceiver operating characteristicEconometricsMachine learningMathematics

MeSH terms

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungData Interpretation, StatisticalFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsHumansLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisMediastinal NeoplasmsPredictive Value of TestsProbabilityROC CurveTomography, X-Ray ComputedModels, StatisticalPoisson DistributionOdds Ratio
Citations
1,417
FWCI
7.26
field-weighted impact
References
17
Percentile
98%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Statistical Aspects of the Analysis of Data From Retrospective Studies of Disease
JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 1959 · 14,848 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.