Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Model-Based Influences on Humans' Choices and Striatal Prediction Errors

Neuron · 2011 · Vol. 69(6) · pp. 1204–1215
Nathaniel D. DawSamuel J. GershmanBen SeymourPeter DayanRaymond J. Dolan

Abstract

The mesostriatal dopamine system is prominently implicated in model-free reinforcement learning, with fMRI BOLD signals in ventral striatum notably covarying with model-free prediction errors. However, latent learning and devaluation studies show that behavior also shows hallmarks of model-based planning, and the interaction between model-based and model-free values, prediction errors, and preferences is underexplored. We designed a multistep decision task in which model-based and model-free influences on human choice behavior could be distinguished. By showing that choices reflected both influences we could then test the purity of the ventral striatal BOLD signal as a model-free report. Contrary to expectations, the signal reflected both model-free and model-based predictions in proportions matching those that best explained choice behavior. These results challenge the notion of a separate model-free learner and suggest a more integrated computational architecture for high-level human decision-making.

Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural dynamics and brain functionReinforcement learningVentral striatumPsychologyTask (project management)Cognitive psychologyStriatumSIGNAL (programming language)Artificial intelligenceNeuroscienceComputer science

MeSH terms

AdultBasal GangliaBrain MappingChoice BehaviorDopamineFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleModels, NeurologicalNeuronsNeuropsychological TestsReinforcement, PsychologyLogistic Models
Citations
1,906
FWCI
28.24
field-weighted impact
References
105
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.