Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Disorders of compulsivity: a common bias towards learning habits

Molecular Psychiatry · 2014 · Vol. 20(3) · pp. 345–352
Valerie VoonKatherine DerbyshireChristian RückMairi IrvineYulia WorbeJesper EnanderL R N SchreiberClaire M. GillanNaomi FinebergBarbara J. SahakianTrevor W. RobbinsNeil A. HarrisonJonathan WoodNathaniel D. DawPeter DayanJ. E. GrantEdward T. Bullmore

Abstract

Why do we repeat choices that we know are bad for us? Decision making is characterized by the parallel engagement of two distinct systems, goal-directed and habitual, thought to arise from two computational learning mechanisms, model-based and model-free. The habitual system is a candidate source of pathological fixedness. Using a decision task that measures the contribution to learning of either mechanism, we show a bias towards model-free (habit) acquisition in disorders involving both natural (binge eating) and artificial (methamphetamine) rewards, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. This favoring of model-free learning may underlie the repetitive behaviors that ultimately dominate in these disorders. Further, we show that the habit formation bias is associated with lower gray matter volumes in caudate and medial orbitofrontal cortex. Our findings suggest that the dysfunction in a common neurocomputational mechanism may underlie diverse disorders involving compulsion.

Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeurological disorders and treatmentsPsychologyOrbitofrontal cortexMechanism (biology)HabitCognitive psychologyCompulsive behaviorBehavioral medicineNeuroscienceOvertrainingPrefrontal cortex

MeSH terms

AdultAlgorithmsBrainChoice BehaviorComputer SimulationFemaleHabitsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedObesityObsessive-Compulsive Disorder

Funding

  • National Center for Responsible Gaming
  • Wellcome Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Gatsby Charitable Foundation
  • Medical Research Council
Citations
661
FWCI
48.97
field-weighted impact
References
48
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.