Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

Measuring Sleep: Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity of Wrist Actigraphy Compared to Polysomnography

SLEEP · 2013 · Vol. 36(11) · pp. 1747–1755
Miguel MarinoYi LiMichael RueschmanJohn W. WinkelmanJ. M. EllenbogenJo M. SoletHilary DulinLisa BerkmanOrfeu M. Buxton

Abstract

This validation quantifies strengths and weaknesses of actigraphy as a tool measuring sleep in clinical and population studies. Overall, the participant-specific accuracy is relatively high, and for most participants, above 80%. We validate this finding across multiple nights and a variety of adults across much of the young to midlife years, in both men and women, in those with and without insomnia, and in 77 participants. We conclude that actigraphy is overall a useful and valid means for estimating total sleep time and wakefulness after sleep onset in field and workplace studies, with some limitations in specificity.

Sleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and Work-Related FatigueActigraphyPolysomnographySleep onsetWakefulnessInsomniaMedicineSleep (system call)PopulationPhysical therapyAnesthesia

MeSH terms

AdultAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificitySleepWakefulnessWristReproducibility of ResultsPolysomnographyActigraphy

Funding

  • Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  • Pfizer
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Wake Forest University
  • Center for Health Design
  • Sunovion
  • Administration for Children and Families
  • Academy of Architecture for Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Citations
1,016
FWCI
24.46
field-weighted impact
References
31
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.