Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Remarks on the use of the apparent surface charges (ASC) methods in solvation problems: Iterative versus matrix‐inversion procedures and the renormalization of the apparent charges

Journal of Computational Chemistry · 1995 · Vol. 16(12) · pp. 1449–1458
Roberto CammiJ. Tomasi

Abstract

Abstract We present a formal and numerical comparison between the iterative and matrix‐inversion approaches of the polarizable continuum model. The formal analysis shows completely the equivalence of the two approaches. Numerical equivalence is also recovered, introducing in both methods the proper boundary conditions on the apparent charge distribution. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

High-pressure geophysics and materialsMagnetism in coordination complexesPhysics of Superconductivity and MagnetismInversion (geology)Equivalence (formal languages)SolvationRenormalizationIterative methodApplied mathematicsMathematicsFixed chargePhysicsMathematical physics

Funding

  • Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
Citations
1,401
FWCI
13.96
field-weighted impact
References
23
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Quantum Mechanical Continuum Solvation Models
Chemical Reviews · 2005 · 16,260 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Remarks on the use of the apparent surface charges (ASC) methods in solvation problems: Iterative versus matrix‐inversion procedures and the renormalization of the apparent charges · Scinovex