Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 10% cited

Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the "landscape of fear" in Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A.

Canadian Journal of Zoology · 2001 · Vol. 79(8) · pp. 1401–1409
John W. LaundréLucina HernándezKelly B. Altendorf

Abstract

The elk or wapiti (Cervus elaphus) and bison (Bison bison) of Yellowstone National Park have lived in an environment free of wolves (Canis lupus) for the last 50 years. In the winter of 1994-1995, wolves were reintroduced into parts of Yellowstone National Park. Foraging theory predicts that elk and bison would respond to this threat by increasing their vigilance levels. We tested this prediction by comparing vigilance levels of elk and bison in areas with wolves with those of elk still in "wolf-free" zones of the Park. Male elk and bison showed no response to the reintroduction of wolves, maintaining the lowest levels of vigilance throughout the study ([Formula: see text]12 and 7% of the time was spent vigilant, respectively). Female elk and bison showed significantly higher vigilance levels in areas with wolves than in areas without wolves. The highest vigilance level (47.5 ± 4.1%; mean ± SE) was seen by the second year for female elk with calves in the areas with wolves and was maintained during the subsequent 3 years of the study. As wolves expanded into non-wolf areas, female elk with and without calves in these areas gradually increased their vigilance levels from initially 20.1 ± 3.5 and 11.5 ± 0.9% to 43.0 ± 5.9 and 30.5 ± 2.8% by the fifth year of the study, respectively. We discuss the possible reasons for the differences seen among the social groups. We suggest that these behavioural responses to the presence of wolves may have more far-reaching consequences for elk and bison ecology than the actual killing of individuals by wolves.

Wildlife Ecology and ConservationEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesAnimal Ecology and Behavior StudiesVigilance (psychology)Bison bisonCanisNational parkForagingGray wolfWildebeestCervus elaphusEcologyWildlife

Funding

  • University of Wyoming
  • Eppley Foundation for Research
  • Idaho State University
  • Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation
  • National Park Service
Citations
1,135
FWCI
6.24
field-weighted impact
References
21
Percentile
97%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
References
Related articles
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Wolves, elk, and bison: reestablishing the "landscape of fear" in Yellowstone National Park, U.S.A. · Scinovex