articleTop 10% cited

Development and Validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC)

Medical Care · 2005 · Vol. 43(5) · pp. 436–444

Russell E. Glasgow✉(Kaiser Permanente)Edward H. Wagner(Group Health Cooperative)Judith Schaefer(Group Health Cooperative)Lisa Mahoney(Group Health Cooperative)Robert J. Reid(Group Health Cooperative)Sarah M. Greene(Group Health Cooperative)

View via DOI Publisher page

Abstract

The PACIC appears to be a practical instrument that is reliable and has face, construct, and concurrent validity. The resulting questionnaire is in the public domain, and recommendations for its use in research and quality improvement are outlined.

Diabetes Management and Education Chronic Disease Management Strategies Primary Care and Health OutcomesConstruct validityMedicinePatient assessmentChronic careInternal consistencyConstruct (python library)Reliability (semiconductor)Primary careScale (ratio)Face validity

MeSH terms

Age FactorsChronic DiseaseFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansIdahoMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CarePsychometricsQuality of Health CareSurveys and QuestionnairesSex FactorsWashingtonReproducibility of Results

Citations

890

FWCI

6.20

field-weighted impact

References

Percentile

97%

vs. same field & year

Citations per year

Cited by

Why Does Patient Activation Matter? An Examination of the Relationships Between Patient Activation and Health-Related Outcomes