Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics

American Journal of Physics · 1982 · Vol. 50(1) · pp. 66–71
John G. Clement

Abstract

Data from written tests and videotaped problem-solving interviews show that many physics students have a stable, alternative view of the relationship between force and acceleration. This ’’conceptual primitive’’ is misunderstood at the qualitative level in addition to any difficulties that might occur with mathematical formulation. The misconception is highly resistant to change and is remarkably similar to one discussed by Galileo, as shown by comparison of his writings with transcripts from student interviews. The source of this qualitative misunderstanding can be traced to a deep-seated preconception that makes a full understanding of Newton’s first and second laws very difficult. In such cases learning becomes a process in which new concepts must displace or be remolded from stable concepts that the student has constructed over many years.

Science Education and PedagogyExperimental and Theoretical Physics StudiesGalileo (satellite navigation)Mathematics educationEpistemologyPhysicsConceptual changeMechanicsPhysics educationQualitative researchConcept learningTheoretical physics
Citations
1,224
FWCI
85.95
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
The initial knowledge state of college physics students
American Journal of Physics · 1985 · 1,070 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics · Scinovex