Scinovex
articleTop 10% cited

Improved tests for a random effects meta‐regression with a single covariate

Statistics in Medicine · 2003 · Vol. 22(17) · pp. 2693–2710
Guido KnappJoachim Härtung

Abstract

The explanation of heterogeneity plays an important role in meta-analysis. The random effects meta-regression model allows the inclusion of trial-specific covariates which may explain a part of the heterogeneity. We examine the commonly used tests on the parameters in the random effects meta-regression with one covariate and propose some new test statistics based on an improved estimator of the variance of the parameter estimates. The approximation of the distribution of the newly proposed tests is based on some theoretical considerations. Moreover, the newly proposed tests can easily be extended to the case of more than one covariate. In a simulation study, we compare the tests with regard to their actual significance level and we consider the log relative risk as the parameter of interest. Our simulation study reflects the meta-analysis of the efficacy of a vaccine for the prevention of tuberculosis originally discussed in Berkey et al. The simulation study shows that the newly proposed tests are superior to the commonly used test in holding the nominal significance level.

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceCovariateStatisticsRandom effects modelEstimatorEconometricsRegression analysisMeta-analysisRegressionMathematicsComputer science

MeSH terms

Analysis of VarianceBCG VaccineComputer SimulationHumansRegression AnalysisTuberculosisMeta-Analysis as TopicModels, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Citations
1,920
FWCI
6.15
field-weighted impact
References
16
Percentile
97%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
A random‐effects regression model for meta‐analysis
Statistics in Medicine · 1995 · 905 citations
How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted?
Statistics in Medicine · 2002 · 2,923 citations
Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods
Statistics in Medicine · 1999 · 1,721 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.