Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects.

Psychological Bulletin · 1993 · Vol. 114(2) · pp. 376–390
Gary H. McClellandCharles M. Judd

Abstract

Although interaction effects are frequently found in experimental studies, field researchers report considerable difficulty in finding theorized moderator effects. Previous discussions of this discrepancy have considered responsible factors including differences in measurement error and use of nonlinear scales. In this article we demonstrate that the differential efficiency of experimental and field tests of interactions is also attributable to the differential residual variances of such interactions once the component main effects have been partialed out. We derive an expression for this residual variance in terms of the joint distribution of the component variables and explore how properties of the distribution affect the efficiency of tests of moderator effects. We show that tests of interactions in field studies will often have less than 20% of the efficiency of optimal experimental tests, and we discuss implications for the design of field studies.

Advanced Statistical Methods and ModelsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods and InferenceModerationPsychologyEconometricsVariance (accounting)ResidualAffect (linguistics)Field (mathematics)InteractionDifferential effectsStatistics

MeSH terms

Data Interpretation, StatisticalHumansMethodsPsychological TestsPsychometricsResearch DesignModels, StatisticalBias
Citations
3,143
FWCI
27.68
field-weighted impact
References
37
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.