review Open AccessTop 1% cited
A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting
BMC Health Services Research · 2013 · Vol. 13(1) · pp. 211–211
Abstract
Despite the existence of significant gaps in the evidence-base, there is growing evidence in support of routine PRO collection in enabling better and patient-centred care in cancer settings.
Cancer survivorship and carePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesClinical practice guidelines implementationMedicineHealth administrationNursing researchHealth informaticsGrading (engineering)Health careSystematic reviewPublic healthAccountabilityEvidence-based practice
MeSH terms
HumansNeoplasmsPhysician-Patient RelationsTreatment OutcomePatient SatisfactionOutcome Assessment, Health CarePractice Guidelines as TopicEvidence-Based MedicineQuality Indicators, Health CareQualitative ResearchSelf Report
Funding
- Cancer Institute NSW
Citations
825
FWCI
11.77
field-weighted impact
References
63
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2015 · 2,577 citations
References
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
BMJ · 2008 · 21,184 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.