Scinovex
articleTop 10% cited

Methods For Measuring Patient Satisfaction With Specific Medical Encounters

Medical Care · 1988 · Vol. 26(4) · pp. 393–402
John E. WareRon D. Hays

Abstract

This paper presents the results of two studies that compared methods for measuring patient satisfaction with specific medical encounters. One form used six-point response scales ranging from "very satisfied" to "very dissatisfied" (S6 scale); the other used five-point scales ranging from "excellent" to "poor" (E5 scale). Forms were assigned randomly to outpatients in fee-for-service (N = 136) and prepaid systems of care (N = 363) and were compared in terms of response variability, reliability, and validity. In both studies, the E5 scales showed greater response variability and better predicted whether patients intended to return to the same doctor in the future, recommend the doctor to a friend, and comply with the medical regimen. Reliability was satisfactory and did not differ between methods. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for constructing visit-specific satisfaction rating scales.

Patient Satisfaction in HealthcarePatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareCustomer Service Quality and LoyaltyReliability (semiconductor)Patient satisfactionRating scaleScale (ratio)PsychologyMedical careApplied psychologyClinical psychologyMedicineFamily medicine

MeSH terms

Ambulatory CareCaliforniaConsumer BehaviorHealth Services ResearchHumansPatient CompliancePhysician-Patient RelationsSurveys and QuestionnairesStatistics as Topic
Citations
593
FWCI
16.61
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Patients’ trust in physicians: Many theories, few measures, and little data
Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2000 · 701 citations
Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty
The Journal of Arthroplasty · 1997 · 404 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.