article Open AccessTop 10% cited
Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30
European Journal of Cancer · 2012 · Vol. 48(11) · pp. 1713–1721
Kim Cocks✉(University of Leeds)Madeleine King(University of Sydney)Galina Velikova(University of Leeds)Gilberto de Castro(Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo)Marrissa Martyn St-James(University of Leeds)Peter Fayers(University of Aberdeen)Julia Brown(University of Leeds)
Cancer survivorship and careHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePalliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesQuality of life (healthcare)Sample size determinationAttritionSample (material)MedicineCore (optical fiber)CancerPsychologyMeta-analysisStatistics
MeSH terms
Expert TestimonyHumansNeoplasmsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesMeta-Analysis as TopicGuidelines as TopicEvidence-Based Medicine
Funding
- University of Leeds
- University of Nottingham
- Queen's University Belfast
- University of Bristol
- Queen's University
- Universidade de São Paulo
- National Taiwan University
- Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris
- National Health and Medical Research Council
Citations
548
FWCI
6.20
field-weighted impact
References
19
Percentile
97%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores.
Journal of Clinical Oncology · 1998 · 2,890 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.