Scinovex
editorial Open AccessTop 1% cited

Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)

Journal of Medical Internet Research · 2004 · Vol. 6(3) · pp. e34–e34
Günther Eysenbach

Abstract

Analogous to checklists of recommendations such as the CONSORT statement (for randomized trials), or the QUORUM statement (for systematic reviews), which are designed to ensure the quality of reports in the medical literature, a checklist of recommendations for authors is being presented by the Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) in an effort to ensure complete descriptions of Web-based surveys. Papers on Web-based surveys reported according to the CHERRIES statement will give readers a better understanding of the sample (self-)selection and its possible differences from a "representative" sample. It is hoped that author adherence to the checklist will increase the usefulness of such reports.

Survey Methodology and NonresponseHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityFocus Groups and Qualitative MethodsChecklistThe InternetConsolidated Standards of Reporting TrialsSample (material)Quality (philosophy)Web applicationWorld Wide WebMEDLINEPsychologyMedical education

MeSH terms

Data CollectionPublishingQuality ControlInternet
Citations
6,119
FWCI
26.65
field-weighted impact
References
5
Percentile
99%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Sharing Health Data for Better Outcomes on PatientsLikeMe
Journal of Medical Internet Research · 2010 · 633 citations
A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS)
Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2021 · 1,943 citations
References
Using the Internet for Surveys and Health Research
Journal of Medical Internet Research · 2002 · 799 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES) · Scinovex