Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Homophily and Differential Returns: Sex Differences in Network Structure and Access in an Advertising Firm

Administrative Science Quarterly · 1992 · Vol. 37(3) · pp. 422–422
Herminia Ibarra

Abstract

Herminia Ibarra Harvard University This paper argues that two network mechanisms operate to create and reinforce gender inequalities in the organizational distribution of power: sex differences in homophily (i.e., tendency to form same-sex network relationships) and in the ability to convert individual attributes and positional resources into network advantages. These arguments were tested in a network analytic study of men's and women's interaction patterns in an advertising firm. Men were more likely to form homophilous ties across multiple networks and to have stronger homophilous ties, while women evidenced a differentiated network pattern in which they obtained social support and friendship from women and instrumental access through network ties to men. Although centrality in organization-wide networks did not vary by sex once controls were instituted, relative to women, men appeared to reap greater network returns from similar individual and positional resources, as well as from homophilous relationships.'

Business Strategy and InnovationHomophilyDifferential (mechanical device)AdvertisingBusinessEconomicsPsychologySocial psychology
Citations
2,136
FWCI
40.78
field-weighted impact
References
34
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
TAKING STOCK OF NETWORKS AND ORGANIZATIONS: A MULTILEVEL PERSPECTIVE.
Academy of Management Journal · 2004 · 2,259 citations
The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research: A Review and Typology
Journal of Management · 2003 · 2,961 citations
On Network Theory
Organization Science · 2011 · 1,552 citations
References
The Strength of Weak Ties
American Journal of Sociology · 1973 · 38,010 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.