Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Model Selection: An Integral Part of Inference

Biometrics · 1997 · Vol. 53(2) · pp. 603–603

Abstract

We argue that model selection uncertainty should be fully incorporated into statistical inference whenever estimation is sensitive to model choice and that choice is made with reference to the data. We consider different philosophies for achieving this goal and suggest strategies for data analysis. We illustrate our methods through three examples. The first is a Poisson regression of bird counts in which a choice is to be made between inclusion of one or both of two covariates. The second is a line transect data set for which different models yield substantially different estimates of abundance. The third is a simulated example in which truth is known.

Bayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceCensus and Population EstimationInferenceSelection (genetic algorithm)Computer scienceMathematicsArtificial intelligence
Citations
1,710
FWCI
30.23
field-weighted impact
References
34
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Null Hypothesis Testing: Problems, Prevalence, and an Alternative
Journal of Wildlife Management · 2000 · 1,944 citations
The Insignificance of Statistical Significance Testing
Journal of Wildlife Management · 1999 · 1,112 citations
The use of fractional polynomials to model continuous risk variables in epidemiology
International Journal of Epidemiology · 1999 · 1,076 citations
Internal validation of predictive models
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · 2001 · 2,572 citations
References
Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife
The Annals of Statistics · 1979 · 17,226 citations
Distance Sampling-Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations.
Journal of Applied Ecology · 1994 · 1,877 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.