Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Should We Trust Web-Based Studies? A Comparative Analysis of Six Preconceptions About Internet Questionnaires.

American Psychologist · 2004 · Vol. 59(2) · pp. 93–104
Samuel D. GoslingSimine VazireSanjay SrivastavaOliver P. John

Abstract

The rapid growth of the Internet provides a wealth of new research opportunities for psychologists. Internet data collection methods, with a focus on self-report questionnaires from self-selected samples, are evaluated and compared with traditional paper-and-pencil methods. Six preconceptions about Internet samples and data quality are evaluated by comparing a new large Internet sample (N = 361,703) with a set of 510 published traditional samples. Internet samples are shown to be relatively diverse with respect to gender, socioeconomic status, geographic region, and age. Moreover, Internet findings generalize across presentation formats, are not adversely affected by nonserious or repeat responders, and are consistent with findings from traditional methods. It is concluded that Internet methods can contribute to many areas of psychology.

Impact of Technology on AdolescentsSocial Media and PoliticsBehavioral Health and InterventionsThe InternetData collectionSocioeconomic statusPsychologySample (material)Applied psychologyWorld Wide WebMedical educationComputer scienceMedicine

MeSH terms

AdultAgedAttitudeFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychologySurveys and QuestionnairesEvidence-Based MedicineInternet
Citations
2,929
FWCI
241.02
field-weighted impact
References
77
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.