Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives.

Psychological Review · 1986 · Vol. 93(2) · pp. 136–153
Daniel KahnemanDale T. Miller

Abstract

A theory of norms and normality is presented and applied to some phenomena of emotional responses, social judgment, and conversations about causes. Norms are assumed to be constructed ad hoc by recruiting specific representations. Category norms are derived by recruiting exemplars. Specific objects or events generate their own norms by retrieval of similar experiences stored in memory or by construction of counterfactual alternatives. The normality of a stimulus is evaluated by comparing it to the norms that it evokes after the fact, rather than to precomputed expectations. Norm theory is applied in analyses of the enhanced emotional response to events that have abnormal causes, of the generation of predictions and inferences from observations of behavior, and of the role of norms in causal questions and answers. This article is concerned with category norms that represent knowledge of concepts and with stimulus norms that govern comparative judgments and designate experiences as surprising. In the tradition of adaptation level theory (Appley, 1971; Helson, 1964), the concept of norm is applied to events that range in complexity from single visual displays to social interactions. We first propose a model of an activation process that produces norms, then explore the role of norms in social cognition. The central idea of the present treatment is that norms are computed after the event rather than in advance. We sketch a supplement to the generally accepted idea that events in the stream of experience are interpreted and evaluated by consulting precomputed schemas and frames of reference. The view developed here is that each stimulus selectively recruits its own alternatives (Garner, 1962, 1970) and is interpreted in a rich context of remembered and constructed representations of what it could have been, might have been, or should have been. Thus, each event brings its own frame of reference into being. We also explore the idea that knowledge of categories (e.g., encounters with Jim) can be derived on-line by selectively evoking stored representations of discrete episodes and exemplars. The present model assumes that a number of representations can be recruited in parallel, by either a stimulus event or an

Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentCognitive and psychological constructs researchDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNorm (philosophy)PsychologyMathematical economicsCognitive psychologyMathematicsEconometricsComputer scienceEpistemologyPhilosophy
Citations
3,027
FWCI
33.31
field-weighted impact
References
710
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Cited by
Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers.
American Psychologist · 1999 · 2,652 citations
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
Academy of Management Review · 2004 · 3,601 citations
Dimensions of Consumer Expertise
Journal of Consumer Research · 1987 · 4,263 citations
Consumer Choice between Hedonic and Utilitarian Goods
Journal of Marketing Research · 2000 · 2,153 citations
The affect heuristic
European Journal of Operational Research · 2006 · 1,400 citations
What is Social Comparison and How Should We Study it?
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · 1996 · 675 citations
References
Attitudes Can Be Measured
American Journal of Sociology · 1928 · 1,456 citations
Genesis of popular but erroneous psychodiagnostic observations.
Journal of Abnormal Psychology · 1967 · 855 citations
Belief in the law of small numbers.
Psychological Bulletin · 1971 · 3,242 citations
On the psychology of prediction.
Psychological Review · 1973 · 6,208 citations
The theory of decision making.
Psychological Bulletin · 1954 · 2,685 citations
The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations.
American Sociological Review · 1958 · 11,959 citations
Rational choice and the structure of the environment.
Psychological Review · 1956 · 5,804 citations
Hindsight is not equal to foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty.
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance · 1975 · 1,764 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.