Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs.

Journal of Applied Psychology · 2001 · Vol. 86(1) · pp. 114–121
Michael K. LindellDavid J. Whitney

Abstract

Cross-sectional studies of attitude-behavior relationships are vulnerable to the inflation of correlations by common method variance (CMV). Here, a model is presented that allows partial correlation analysis to adjust the observed correlations for CMV contamination and determine if conclusions about the statistical and practical significance of a predictor have been influenced by the presence of CMV. This method also suggests procedures for designing questionnaires to increase the precision of this adjustment.

Economic and Environmental ValuationStatistical Methods and ApplicationsBehavioral Health and InterventionsVariance (accounting)Common-method variancePsychologyStatisticsVariance inflation factorEconometricsAnalysis of varianceInflation (cosmology)CorrelationExplained variation

MeSH terms

AttitudeBehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesHumansModels, TheoreticalSurveys and Questionnaires
Citations
7,646
FWCI
39.37
field-weighted impact
References
27
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Related articles
Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs.
Journal of Applied Psychology · 2001 · 7,646 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.