Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 10% cited

Ligand binding assays at equilibrium: validation and interpretation

British Journal of Pharmacology · 2010 · Vol. 161(6) · pp. 1219–1237
Edward C. HulmeMike Trevethick

Abstract

The focus of this review paper is factors affecting data interpretation in ligand binding assays under equilibrium conditions. Protocols for determining K(d) (the equilibrium dissociation constant) and K(dA) (the equilibrium inhibitor constant) for receptor ligands are discussed. The basic theory describing the interaction of a radiotracer and an unlabelled competitor ligand with a receptor is developed. Inappropriate experimental design may result in ligand depletion and non-attainment of equilibrium, distorting the calculation of K(d) and K(dA) . Strategies, both theoretical and practical, will be given to avoid and correct such errors, thus leading to the determination of reliable values for these constants. In determining K(dA) from competition binding studies, two additional concepts are discussed. First, the necessity to measure an adequate specific binding signal from the bound radiotracer ligand limits the range of affinity constants that can be measured: a particular set of assay conditions may lead to an upper limit on the apparent affinity of unlabelled ligands. Second, an extension of the basic assay methodology can indicate whether the interaction between the tracer and a test ligand is mediated by a competitive or an allosteric mechanism. Finally, the review ends with a discussion of two factors that are often overlooked: buffer composition and the temperature at which the assay is conducted, and the impact these can have on affinity measurements and the understanding of drug interactions.

Receptor Mechanisms and SignalingMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies ResearchComputational Drug Discovery MethodsInterpretation (philosophy)Computational biologyComputer scienceChemistryInformation retrievalBiologyProgramming language

MeSH terms

AnimalsBinding, CompetitiveBuffersHumansLigandsProtein BindingRadioligand AssayReceptors, DrugReproducibility of Results

Funding

  • Medical Research Council
Citations
659
FWCI
6.63
field-weighted impact
References
50
Percentile
98%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.