Scinovex
review Open AccessTop 1% cited

Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2007 · Vol. 11(2) · pp. MR000005–MR000005
Roberta W. SchererPatricia LangenbergErik von Elm

Abstract

More than half of results from abstracts, and almost a third of randomized trial results initially presented as abstracts fail to be published in full and this problem does not appear to be decreasing over time. Publication bias is present in that 'positive' results were more frequently published than 'not positive' results. Reports of methodology research written in English showed that a higher proportion of abstracts had been published in full, as did those from native English-speaking countries, suggesting that studies from non-native English-speaking countries may be underrepresented in the scientific literature. After the considerable work involved in adding in the more than 300 additional studies found by the February 2016 searches, we chose not to update the search again because additional searches are unlikely to change these overall conclusions in any important way.

Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsAcademic Writing and PublishingHealth and Medical Research ImpactsPublication biasConfidence intervalCitationMedicineMEDLINECochrane LibraryMeta-analysisScience Citation IndexLibrary scienceComputer science

MeSH terms

Congresses as TopicPublishingTime FactorsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicPublication BiasControlled Clinical Trials as Topic
Citations
950
FWCI
55.86
field-weighted impact
References
270
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Full publication of results initially presented in abstracts
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2007 · 950 citations
Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study
International Journal of Epidemiology · 2002 · 878 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.