Scinovex
article Open AccessTop 1% cited

The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research

PLoS Biology · 2015 · Vol. 13(6) · pp. e1002165–e1002165
Leonard P. FreedmanIain CockburnTimothy Simcoe

Abstract

Low reproducibility rates within life science research undermine cumulative knowledge production and contribute to both delays and costs of therapeutic drug development. An analysis of past studies indicates that the cumulative (total) prevalence of irreproducible preclinical research exceeds 50%, resulting in approximately US$28,000,000,000 (US$28B)/year spent on preclinical research that is not reproducible-in the United States alone. We outline a framework for solutions and a plan for long-term improvements in reproducibility rates that will help to accelerate the discovery of life-saving therapies and cures.

Biosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsCell Image Analysis TechniquesBiomedical and Engineering EducationPreclinical researchReproducibilityBiologyDrug developmentPharmacologyDrugBioinformaticsStatistics

MeSH terms

Reproducibility of ResultsBiomedical Research
Citations
1,066
FWCI
50.50
field-weighted impact
References
37
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · 2011 · 1,909 citations
Reproducibility in Science
Circulation Research · 2014 · 1,035 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.