article Open AccessTop 1% cited
The Economics of Reproducibility in Preclinical Research
PLoS Biology · 2015 · Vol. 13(6) · pp. e1002165–e1002165
Leonard P. Freedman✉(American National Standards Institute)Iain Cockburn(Boston University)Timothy Simcoe(Council of Economic Advisers)
Abstract
Low reproducibility rates within life science research undermine cumulative knowledge production and contribute to both delays and costs of therapeutic drug development. An analysis of past studies indicates that the cumulative (total) prevalence of irreproducible preclinical research exceeds 50%, resulting in approximately US$28,000,000,000 (US$28B)/year spent on preclinical research that is not reproducible-in the United States alone. We outline a framework for solutions and a plan for long-term improvements in reproducibility rates that will help to accelerate the discovery of life-saving therapies and cures.
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical MethodsCell Image Analysis TechniquesBiomedical and Engineering EducationPreclinical researchReproducibilityBiologyDrug developmentPharmacologyDrugBioinformaticsStatistics
MeSH terms
Reproducibility of ResultsBiomedical Research
Citations
1,066
FWCI
50.50
field-weighted impact
References
37
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets?
Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · 2011 · 1,909 citations
Reproducibility in Science
Circulation Research · 2014 · 1,035 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
