Scinovex
article Open Access

A prospective study to compare the outcomes of supine versus prone mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of renal pelvic stones larger than 2 cm

International Journal of Urology Research · 2025 · Vol. 7(2) · pp. 43–49

Abstract

Aim: To compare the outcomes of supine versus prone mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of renal pelvic stones larger than 2 cm. Material and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at Department of Urology, MMIMSR, Mullana, Ambala from June 2023 to June 2025 among 50 patients with renal pelvic stones more than 2 cm. They were alternatively allocated to group A and B. Group A included patients undergoing supine mini PCNL, while patients undergoing prone mini PCNL were included in group B. Results: Nephrostomy was kept in 2 (8%) patients in supine mini-PCNL group while 18 (72%) patients among prone mini-PCNL group. There was a significant difference in the number of patients having nephrostomy (p

Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsPercutaneous nephrolithotomySupine positionMedicineProspective cohort studyPercutaneousRenal stoneKidney stonesUrologySurgeryInternal medicine
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
1
Percentile
32%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

A prospective study to compare the outcomes of supine versus prone mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy for management of renal pelvic stones larger than 2 cm · Scinovex