A prospective study to evaluate the outcomes of both conservative and surgical treatments for supracondylar humerus fractures among paediatric population
Abstract
Background: Supracondylar humerus fractures (SCHF) account for around 60% of elbow fractures and 85% of surgically treated fractures in the paediatric population. Effective management is crucial to ensure favourable outcomes and prevent complications. Aims and Objectives: The purpose of our study is to determine the functional outcome of conservation versus surgical management of displaced Supracondylar fracture of humerus. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted among 60 patients aged between 5 and 15 years, all diagnosed with displaced supracondylar humerus fractures Gartland type II and III. They were divided into 2 groups for study purpose. Group A includes 30 patients managed conservatively and Group B includes 30 patients managed surgically either closed or open reduction followed by internal fixation using medial and lateral K-wires, along with early elbow mobilization. Both clinical and radiological evaluations were performed, and final outcomes were assessed using Flynn’s criteria. Results: By Flynn’s criteria, 08 (26.67%) excellent results were obtained in patients who were treated conservatively, and 25 (83.33%) excellent results were obtained in the surgical treatment group and the difference is statistically significant P value
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
