CT vs. MRI perfusion in stroke imaging: A review of current evidence and emerging technologies
Abstract
Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) management increasingly relies on advanced imaging to identify salvageable brain tissue (the ischemic penumbra) and guide reperfusion therapy. This review examines and contrasts Computed Tomography Perfusion (CTP) and magnetic resonance perfusion (MRP) imaging in stroke, focusing on diagnostic accuracy, clinical outcomes, and emerging technologies (2018-2025). Key findings from recent studies are summarized: adding CTP to standard CT protocols significantly improves detection of ischemia (sensitivity rising ~19.5%) without compromising specificity, and CTP notably enhanced diagnostic accuracy (residents’ AUC from ~88% to 97%). MRI-based protocols detect strokes with higher sensitivity than CT and substantially reduce treatment of stroke mimics (CTP vs MRI mimic thrombolysis: 8.6% vs 4.3%, p
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
