Scinovex
review Open Access

CT vs. MRI perfusion in stroke imaging: A review of current evidence and emerging technologies

International Journal of Bioscience and Biochemistry · 2025 · Vol. 7(2) · pp. 87–93

Abstract

Acute Ischemic Stroke (AIS) management increasingly relies on advanced imaging to identify salvageable brain tissue (the ischemic penumbra) and guide reperfusion therapy. This review examines and contrasts Computed Tomography Perfusion (CTP) and magnetic resonance perfusion (MRP) imaging in stroke, focusing on diagnostic accuracy, clinical outcomes, and emerging technologies (2018-2025). Key findings from recent studies are summarized: adding CTP to standard CT protocols significantly improves detection of ischemia (sensitivity rising ~19.5%) without compromising specificity, and CTP notably enhanced diagnostic accuracy (residents’ AUC from ~88% to 97%). MRI-based protocols detect strokes with higher sensitivity than CT and substantially reduce treatment of stroke mimics (CTP vs MRI mimic thrombolysis: 8.6% vs 4.3%, p

Advanced X-ray and CT ImagingAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingPerfusion scanningStroke (engine)MedicineCurrent (fluid)RadiologyMagnetic resonance imagingPerfusionEngineering
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
24
Percentile
16%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

CT vs. MRI perfusion in stroke imaging: A review of current evidence and emerging technologies · Scinovex