Scinovex
article Open Access

Assessing section 168a of the CGST act, 2017: Post-covid impact on notices and orders under section 73

International Journal of Law Justice and Jurisprudence · 2025 · Vol. 5(1) · pp. 119–122

Abstract

Section 168A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act (CGST), 2017, allows the government to extend statutory deadlines during force majeure events like pandemics. While it provided relief during COVID-19, its continued use for deadline extensions post-pandemic has raised legal concerns. Notifications such as 35/2020, 14/2021, 13/2022, and 09/2023 extended deadlines under Section 73, sparking debate on whether administrative challenges qualify as force majeure, which requires impossibility, not mere difficulty. Critics argue these extensions contradict the legislative intent of Section 168A, leading to legal challenges over jurisdictional overreach. This paper examines its scope, post-pandemic application, and impact on taxpayers and litigation, assessing its legal and constitutional validity. Findings emphasize the need for clearer legislative guidelines to prevent misuse of emergency provisions.

Socio-economic Development and SustainabilityArctic and Russian Policy StudiesEuropean and International Law StudiesSection (typography)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakVirologyComputer scienceMedicineOperating systemInternal medicineOutbreak
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
7%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Assessing section 168a of the CGST act, 2017: Post-covid impact on notices and orders under section 73 · Scinovex