Comparison of ayurvedic Ksharakarma and conventional surgical techniques in the treatment of hemorrhoids

Abstract

This study compares the effectiveness of Ksharakarma (Ayurvedic therapy) and conventional surgical techniques in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Hemorrhoids are a common anorectal disorder treated surgically, but Ksharakarma offers a minimally invasive alternative. Introduction: Hemorrhoids affect a significant portion of the population, often leading to pain and discomfort. Conventional surgical techniques, although effective, may have longer recovery times and postoperative complications. Methods: A total of 100 patients were treated with either Ksharakarma or conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Patients were observed for postoperative pain, healing time, complications, and recurrence over six months. Results: Results showed that Ksharakarma had significantly lower postoperative pain, shorter healing times, and fewer complications compared to conventional surgery, with similar long-term efficacy. Discussion: Ksharakarma, through its minimally invasive nature, results in better patient comfort and faster recovery, making it a viable alternative to conventional surgical treatments for hemorrhoids. Conclusion: In conclusion, Ksharakarma demonstrates comparable long-term outcomes with fewer postoperative complications, offering a promising alternative for hemorrhoid treatment. Further research is warranted to validate these findings on a larger scale.