The investigative evidence and its role in proving disciplinary cases (A comparative study)

Abstract

To determine the role of investigative evidence in proof, it is initiated by the administrative judge based on their investigative powers within administrative matters. This role differs from that of a regular judge, whose involvement in disputes is typically passive, intervening only to resolve the conflict. In contrast, the administrative judge directs the methods of investigation in the dispute before them. Moreover, the administrative judge has broad authority to consider and use these means and pieces of evidence without being bound by them, as the legislator has not assigned a specific weight to each means of proof.