In-vitro compatibility of Penicillium pinophilum with commonly used fungicides, insecticides herbicides and fertilizers in different crops
Abstract
An in-vitro compatibility studies were conducted with Penicillium pinophilum and some commonly used, commercially available chemical pesticides and fertilizers in sugarcane. The experiment was laid out in a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with three replications and thirteen treatments. In this study, three treatments of fungicides [Carbendazim 50% WP (Bavistin), Mancozeb 63% WP + Carbendazim 12% WP (SAAF), Thiophenate methyl 70% WP (Roko)], three treatments of insecticides [Thiamethoxam 30% FS (Slayer pro), Chlorpyriphos 50% + Cypermethrin 5% EC (Hamla), Azoxystrobin 2.5% + Thiophenate methyl 11.25% + Thiomethoxam 25% FS (Electron)], three treatments of herbicides [Atrazine 50% WP (Atrataf), Ametryne 80% WDG (Tamar), 2, 4-D sodium salt 44% + Metribuzin 35% + Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl 1.0% WG (Triskele)], three treatments of fertilizers (Urea, Di-ammonium phosphate, Muriate of potash) and P. pinophilum culture grown on PDA served as a control. Among fungicides, Carbendazim and Thiophenate methyl were found to be compatible, whereas Mancozeb + Carbendazim was found to be toxic. The insecticides Thiomethoxam and Azoxystrobin + Thiophenate methyl + Thiomethoxam were compatible, while Chlorpyriphos + Cypermethrin proved incompatible. The herbicides, Ametryne and 2, 4-D sodium salt + Metribuzin + Pyrazosulfuron were incompatible and Atrazine was found to be slightly toxic. Among fertilizers, Urea and Di-ammonium phosphate were found to be compatible and Muriate of potash showed additional colony growth over control.
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
