Scinovex
article Open Access

Comparing aspirin, enoxaparin, and rivaroxaban post primary total knee replacement: A prospective study from Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing major orthopedic surgery are at significantly high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), and therefore the routine use of thromboprophylaxis has been standard-of-care for several years. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes for aspirin, enoxaparin, and rivaroxaban post primary total knee replacement surgery. Method: This is a prospective observational study that is done in two medical centers in Saudi Arabia. A prospective data collection sheet was used to follow up each patient for 35 days post-surgery. Results: In this study, 242 patients were included with a response rate of 87.86% (242/276), according to the type of Extended VTE Prophylaxis medications patients were divided on 3 groups; Enoxaparin 85/242 (35.1 %), Rivaroxaban 128/242 (52.9 %), Aspirin 29/242 (12.0 %). Conclusion: In this study, rivaroxaban has the worst profile, in both having the highest number of DVT cases, as well as 2 minor bleeding cases. Aspirin group patients have the best profile in terms of complications and recovery measures post-surgery.

Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementAntiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesSynthesis of β-Lactam CompoundsRivaroxabanMedicineAspirinTotal knee replacementKnee replacementSurgeryInternal medicineOrthopedic surgeryWarfarinAtrial fibrillation
Citations
3
FWCI
0.37
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
66%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Comparing aspirin, enoxaparin, and rivaroxaban post primary total knee replacement: A prospective study from Saudi Arabia · Scinovex