article Open Access
Principal component analysis and local binary patterns: A comparative study using different databases
International Journal of Engineering in Computer Science · 2023 · Vol. 5(2) · pp. 21–26
Abstract
This paper compares the efficiency of two popular feature extraction methods Principal Component Analysis and Local Binary Pattern using two different iris databases CASIA and UBIRIS. For classification, Support Vector Machine has been used. The models were tested using 200 iris images. The Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve has been drawn and AUC was calculated. The result shows that LBP achieves better performance with both CASIA and UBIRIS databases compared to PCA. The experiment has been extended by varying the dataset sizes. The result has shown that LBP outperforms PCA with both CASIA and UBIRIS.
Advanced Algorithms and ApplicationsSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesPrincipal component analysisPattern recognition (psychology)Local binary patternsFeature (linguistics)Artificial intelligenceBinary numberFeature extractionComponent (thermodynamics)Computer scienceSupport vector machine
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
22
Percentile
22%
vs. same field & year
References
A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions
Pattern Recognition · 1996 · 6,763 citations
A human identification technique using images of the iris and wavelet transform
IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · 1998 · 1,123 citations
Iris recognition: an emerging biometric technology
Proceedings of the IEEE · 1997 · 2,194 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
