Scinovex
article

Laparscopic versus transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized study

Abstract

Background: The surgical procedure known as hysterectomy is widely recognized as the prevailing gynecological intervention worldwide, particularly in cases with non-malignant diseases. The purpose of this study was to contrast between closure of vaginal cuff after total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) trans-laparoscopic or through vaginal approach.Methods: This prospective simple randomized controlled study was carried out on 80 women aged from 45to 65years old and body mass index<35 with benign lesions like multiple fibroids, endometrial hyperplasia and adenomyosis. Patients were divided into two equal groups underwent TLH with vaginal cuff closure through intracorporeal laparoscopic suture using vicryl 1 in Group I (Intracorporeal closure) and. vaginal route using vicryl 1 in Group II (Transvaginal closure).Results: Logistic regression with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) predicting post-operative complications. OR of BMI was 1.187, and the CI ranged from 1.009 to 1.396 (P= 0.039). Logistic regression with OR and 95% CI predicting any cuff complication. OR of Age was 0.648, and the CI ranged from 0.482 to 0.871 (P= 0.004). OR of diabetes was 36.500, and the CI ranged from 2.703 to 492.862 (P= 0.007). Conclusions: Intracorporeal laparoscopic closure of vaginal cuff is better than vaginal closure during TLH.

Uterine Myomas and TreatmentsEndometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsMedicineHysterectomyCuffClosure (psychology)Randomized controlled trialSurgery
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
28%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

Laparscopic versus transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff in patients undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A randomized study · Scinovex