Scinovex
paratext Open Access

Untitled

Alaa BatalRozita HassanB WeltmanK VigH FieldsS ShankerE KaizarR ParkerE HarrisW SharpeB ReedJ SubtelnyA PolsonG SameshimaP SinclairS BaumrindE KornR BoydH SimplcioDa SilvaJspFernandes Rabelo CaldasSDos Santos-PintoAB ZachrissonL AlnaesS AlstadB ZachrissonJ BallrickJ PalomoE RuchB AmbermanM HansM BercoRigali JrP MinerR DelucaS AndersonN WillLJ LudlowW LasterM SeeLtj BaileyH HersheyS SarikayaB HaydarS CierM AriyrekL MarquesM Ramos-JorgeA ReyArmondDe Oliveira RuellasAE LiouP ChangH AhnS MoonS BaekT TrkS Elekdag-TrkM DinerJ ParkK TaiM TakagiK MiyajimaY KojimaB Joo

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the CBCT images before and after en-masse retraction in patients with class II division 1 to evaluate the effect of en-masse retraction on the height of alveolar bone and the external apical root resorption.The sample consisted of 15 adult patients with class II division 1 (9 females and 6 males, mean ages of 20.822.01)treated with extraction of the first premolars and nonsliding mechanics using metal power arms.CBCT images for each subject were taken before and after en-masse retraction to evaluate external apical root resorption (EARR) and vertical alveolar bone level (VABL).Paired-sample t-tests were used to determine if there were any differences in EARR and VABL before and after en-masse retraction.There was significant root resorption for all teeth during en-masse retraction and significant difference in vertical alveolar bone level on palatal side just for upper incisor teeth.In contrast, there was no significant difference in alveolar bone level on labial side.

Biology
Citations
0
FWCI
field-weighted impact
References
18
Percentile
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.