Scinovex
article Open Access

Accuracy of digital scan body impression for implant supported fixed partial denture by using intra and extra-oral scanners (comparative in vitro study)

International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences · 2023 · Vol. 9(3) · pp. 93–97
Youssef Ahmed NaguibHesham Al AnsaryEl sabbahy A. Youssef

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the accuracy of digital scan body impression for implant supported fixed partial denture using an intra-oral and extra-oral digital scannerMaterial and Methods: A typodont cast with acrylic teeth was used, afterwards cast duplication and surgical guide were fabricated for drilling 0f implant fixture placement. The scan bodies were fixed on the implant fixture. Samples were divided into two groups. Group 1 intra-oral scanning (IOS) 10 samples using Medit i500 and for Group 2 extra-oral scanner (EOS) 10 samples using Medit T500. The reference model scanned using extra-oral scanner to be transferred as an STL file. That was used as a control group for comparison. The STL files from both groups with the reference model were analyzed by the metrology software Geomagic. For trueness comparison, the IOS and EOS group were supper imposed into the reference cast with scan bodies. For precision comparison the IOS group was over-imposed on one another, and the EOS group technique was also over-imposed on each other.Results: It was found that the precision of both IOS and EOS was clinically accepted with no significant difference between both groups.Conclusion: Through this study, it can be evidenced that the IOS and scan body are a valid alternative to conventional techniques of impressions with elastomeric materials for obtaining accurate restorations of the short-span implant fixed prosthodontics.

Dental Implant Techniques and OutcomesDental materials and restorationsEngineering Technology and MethodologiesFixed prosthodonticsImpressionFixtureScannerImplantRemovable partial dentureDentistryOrthodonticsComputer scienceBiomedical engineering
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
22
Percentile
14%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.