Scinovex
paratext Open Access

Untitled

Roshan SadiyaUtkarsh PiyushMrudhula KamalS PassosA FreitasS JumailyM SantosA RizkallaG SantosF MannocciJ CowieG KumarA ShivrayanN JayanthiV VinodA GopinathanP JeevaT VinayakumarM El-NawawyL KoraitimO AbouelattaH HegaziM ChangJ DennisonP YamanF El-AskaryS BotrosM NassifM zcanA PoleselS SonwaneU HambireK FrauscherN IlieN IlieM El-NawawyL KoraitimO AbouelattaH HegaziM RouhollahiM MohammadibasirS TalimA RastelliD JacomassiA FaloniT QueirozS RojasM BernardiV BagnatoF OglahP MazumdarA DasZ ArslanogluH AltanO SahinM TekinM AdigzelN IlieH BauerM DraenertR HickelA SaamahA SaidN Yahya

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate the depth of cure and flexural strength of 4 tooth colored direct core build-up materials-a nanocomposite, microhybrid composite, resin modified GIC and a modified composite. Materials and Methods: 240 samples of 4 tooth colored core build-up materials were prepared from polytetrafluoroethylene molds to assess the depth of cure and flexural strength. Samples were divided equally into 4 groups (n=60) [Group I-nanocomposite, Group II-micro hybrid composite, Group IIIresin modified GIC and Group IV-modified composite-Cention N]. Each group was further divided into 2 subgroups. Subgroup A (n=40) for measuring depth of cure by Vickers' hardness number and Subgroup B (n=20)-for measuring flexural strength. Subgroup A of each group was further divided equally into 4 divisions according to thickness of the restorative material placed into the designated mold (1mm, 2mm, 3mm and 4mm). The results were statistically analyzed using ANOVA, multiple comparisons (post-hoc test) were carried out using Bonferroni test. Results: At different heights of the specimen, Group IV recorded the highest mean micro hardness followed by Group II, Group I and Group III. Higher mean micro hardness was recorded by all the core build-up materials in the radiated surface compared to non-radiated surface. Higher mean flexural strength was recorded in Group IV followed by Group II, Group I and Group III respectively.

MathematicsComputer science
Citations
0
FWCI
field-weighted impact
References
21
Percentile
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.