Scinovex
article Open Access

Evaluation of the coaching program for petanque sports in Kediri District

Ayutisa RizqanadaYudik PrasetyoDinar Tyas HutamiGusti Putra Darma

Abstract

This study aims to determine the results of the evaluation of the coaching program for petanque sports in Kediri district.This is an evaluation research. The evaluation model used in this research is CIPP. The subjects of this research were indicators, coaches and petanque athletes throughout the Kediri District. Purposive sampling is used as the sampling technique.The results showed that the evaluation of the petanque sports coaching program in the Kediri District was 2.74 in the good category. In addition, each evaluation aspect is broken down, namely: 1) the context of the evaluation score is 3.34 in the good category. The score for the background indicators for the coaching program, is 3.44 in the good category, the objective of the coaching program score is 3.50 in the good category, and the coaching program is in the 3.07 good category. 2) The input for the evaluation of the coaching program is 2.47 in poor category. Based on the indicators of human resources, it gets score 2.68 in good category, the trainer program in 2.64 in the good category, funding by 2.36 in the poor category, facilities and infrastructure in the 2.22 category in the poor category, and parental support in 2.45 in the poor category. 3) The process of evaluating the coaching program for petanque sports throughout the Kediri District is 2.71 in the good category. Based on the indicators of program implementation, its score is 2.61 in the good category and 2.80 in the good category for coordination. 4) Product evaluation of the coaching program gets 2.44 is in the poor category. Based on the achievement indicators of 2.44 in poor category.

Sports and Physical Education ResearchChild Development and EducationMultimedia Learning SystemsCoachingNonprobability samplingContext (archaeology)TrainerPsychologyAthletesApplied psychologyMedical educationMedicinePopulation
Citations
3
FWCI
1.30
field-weighted impact
References
28
Percentile
82%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.