Scinovex
article Open Access

Comparative assessment of two imaging modalities and their application in the evaluation of pancreatic/peripancreatic changes due to acute pancreatitis

Pavan Kumar KArul T DasanP Sanjay

Abstract

Aim: Comparison of two imaging modalities and their application in the evaluation of pancreatic/peripancreatic changes due to acute pancreatitis.Materials and Methods: The present comparative study was performed on 100 patients suspected of acute pancreatitis confirmed by elevated serum amylase and serum lipase levels, between November 2015 to May 2017 in the Department of Radiodiagnosis in Victoria Hospital and Bowring and Lady Curzon Hospital attached to Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru. All patients underwent a real-time ultrasound scan of the abdomen using a curvilinear transducer of 2 to 6 MHz of Philips IU22 and triple-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography of the abdomen by Philips INGENUITY 128 slice CT in Victoria hospital or Siemens SOMATOM 6 slice CT present in Bowring hospital.Results: Most patients with acute pancreatitis (~30%) belonged to the age group 41-50 years while 28% each belonged to the age group 31-41 and 41-50 years respectively. Amongst males (n=88), 72% (n=64) were cases of acute pancreatitis and 28% (n=24) were the cases of acute on pancreatitis. On the other hand, of 12 females, 58% (n=07) were the cases of acute pancreatitis and 42% (n=05) were the cases of acute on chronic pancreatitis. Both ultrasonography (US) and MDCT were able to delineate normal-sized pancreas, increased size of head and body of pancreas and atrophic pancreas. While the US was able to identify only 17 cases, CT was able to detect 55 with a sensitivity of ~31%, which was statistically significant (p

Pancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentLiver Disease Diagnosis and TreatmentPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology ResearchMedicineAcute pancreatitisPancreatitisPancreasAbdomenRadiologyComputed tomographyUltrasoundGastroenterologyInternal medicine
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
8
Percentile
14%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.