articleTop 1% cited
Rethinking Representation
American Political Science Review · 2003 · Vol. 97(4) · pp. 515–528
Jane Mansbridge✉(Harvard University Press)
Abstract
Along with the traditional “promissory” form of representation, empirical political scientists have recently analyzed several new forms, called here “anticipatory,” “gyroscopic,” and “surrogate” representation. None of these more recently recognized forms meets the criteria for democratic accountability developed for promissory representation, yet each generates a set of normative criteria by which it can be judged. These criteria are systemic, in contrast to the dyadic criteria appropriate for promissory representation. They are deliberative rather than aggregative. They are plural rather than singular.
Electoral Systems and Political ParticipationSocial Policy and Reform StudiesPopulism, Right-Wing MovementsRepresentation (politics)PluralNormativeSet (abstract data type)PoliticsAccountabilityDemocracyEpistemologyPolitical scienceComputer science
Citations
1,747
FWCI
64.60
field-weighted impact
References
29
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
Constituency Influence in Congress
American Political Science Review · 1963 · 2,305 citations
Decisions and Nondecisions: An Analytical Framework
American Political Science Review · 1963 · 1,232 citations
Dynamic Representation
American Political Science Review · 1995 · 1,290 citations
Citation Network
How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.
