paratext Open Access

Untitled

International Journal of Applied Dental Sciences · 2022 · Vol. 8(1)

Priya Sarraf✉(Baba Farid University of Health Sciences)Archan Dhanesha(Sinhgad Dental College and Hospital)Arshpreet Kaur(Rajasthan Dental College and Hospital)Surabhi Kaushik(Baba Farid University of Health Sciences)Gahana GC(Kamineni Institute of Dental Sciences)Ektaba Rana(Rajasthan Dental College and Hospital)S SchmoldtT KirkpatrickR RutledgG LawleyW SchindlerWalker 3rdWaM CvekH TopuoluB KesimS DzgnS DesaiN ChandlerC StuartS SchwartzT BeesonN KatebzadehB DaltonM TropeJ SorensenJ MartinoffJ SorensenS AhnH BergeV NikhilP JhaA AggarwalMrunalini DholakiaVaidyaJ SilujjaiP Linsuwanont

View via DOI Full-text PDF

Abstract

The development of immature teeth can be arrested because of various harmful stimuli such as trauma, caries, and anatomic variations such as dens evaginatus. The present study was conducted to compare fracture the resistance of simulated human immature teeth treated with anatomic post and MTA as apical barrier. Materials & Methods: 32 permanent mandibular incisors were randomly divided into two groups of 16 each. Group I-apical barrier using Biodentine and Group II-apical barrier using MTA (MTA Plus). Fracture resistance was compared. Results: Fracture resistance of control was 640.4 and in group II was 613.5. Everstick showed value of 1476.3 MPa in group I and 1290.5 MPa in group II. Inter-group comparison was significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Authors found that everstick post is a viable option for reinforcement of teeth with immature root apex.

Computer science

Citations

FWCI

—

field-weighted impact

References

Percentile

—

vs. same field & year

Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.