Scinovex
article

A simple proof on the Fermat’s last theorem in cases of n=3k (k=1,2,3……)

Abstract

Using simple mathematics of middle school and “the disprove method”, the paper discusses a special case of x=y of the Fermat’s last theorem, but strangely, if x=y, from Diophantine equation it derives an impossible equality 2=1, therefore, it is reasonable to suggest that with respect to Fermat’s last theorem, it should supplement a restriction of x =y = z. Moreover, all the positive integers which is bigger than 2 can be represented by n=3k; n=3k+1; and n=3k+2 (k=1,2,3, ……), on the basis of the proof on the Fermat’s last theorem in case of n=3, using the mathematical induction and “the disprove method” the paper proves that the theorem is also true for all cases of n=3k (k=1,2,3,……).

History and Theory of MathematicsMathematics and ApplicationsAnalytic Number Theory ResearchFermat's Last TheoremMathematicsFermat numberSimple (philosophy)Fermat's little theoremDiophantine equationProofs of Fermat's little theoremDiscrete mathematicsWieferich primeMathematical induction
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
0
Percentile
17%
vs. same field & year
Related articles
A Simple Proof on Fermat’s Last Theorem in Case of n=3
Journal of Mathematical Problems Equations and Statistics · 2020 · 0 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

A simple proof on the Fermat’s last theorem in cases of n=3k (k=1,2,3……) · Scinovex