Scinovex
article Open Access

A comparative study to evaluate the difference between one tube method and two tube method of submental intubation in panfacial trauma

International Journal of Medical Anesthesiology · 2020 · Vol. 3(2) · pp. 03–07
Anshul NemaManish BanjareBasant Kumar NingawalKK Arora

Abstract

Anaesthesia for pan-facial surgeries is challenging because the anaesthesiologist and surgeon have to share the common upper airway field. We used submen­tal intubation as an alternative to tracheostomy in the airway manage­ment of patients with complex panfa­cial fractures. The aim of our study was to evaluate the difference between 1 tube method and 2 tube method of submental intubation in panfacial trauma. We found that the 2 tube method is always a better option than conventional 1 tube method because there are less chances of compromising the airway due to difficulty during passing the tube and it can be performed with nondetachable connector tube.

Airway Management and Intubation TechniquesHead and Neck Surgical OncologyTracheal and airway disordersTube (container)IntubationAirwayMedicineEndotracheal tubeAnesthesiaSurgerySignificant differenceAirway managementEngineering
Citations
0
FWCI
0.00
field-weighted impact
References
10
Percentile
11%
vs. same field & year
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.

A comparative study to evaluate the difference between one tube method and two tube method of submental intubation in panfacial trauma · Scinovex