Scinovex
articleTop 1% cited

Electoral Competition and Special Interest Politics

The Review of Economic Studies · 1996 · Vol. 63(2) · pp. 265–265
Gene M. GrossmanElhanan Helpman

Abstract

We study the competition between two political parties for seats in a legislature. The parties have fixed positions on some issues, but vary their positions on others in order to attract votes and campaign contributions. In this context, we examine whether special interest groups are governed by an electoral motive or an influence in their campaign giving, and how their contributions affect the equilibrium platforms. We show that each party is induced to behave as if it were maximizing a weighted sum of the aggregate welfares of informed voters and members of special interest groups. The party that is expected to win a majority of seats caters more to the special interests.

Game Theory and Voting SystemsPolitics, Economics, and Education PolicyEconomic Policies and ImpactsEconomicsPoliticsCompetition (biology)Neoclassical economicsMarket economyPolitical economyInternational economicsPositive economicsPolitical scienceLaw

Funding

  • National Science Foundation
  • Princeton University
  • European University Institute
Citations
1,057
FWCI
34.75
field-weighted impact
References
24
Percentile
100%
vs. same field & year
Citations per year
References
The Logic of Collective Action.
American Sociological Review · 1966 · 11,571 citations
Citation Network

How this paper connects to the literature. Drag to explore, click any node to open that paper.